Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gsl.html
On 08/11/15 12:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 07-11-15 21:39, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: >> On 7 November 2015 at 20:17, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> | Hi Dirk, >> | >> | On Fri, 06 Nov 2015 15:06:14 +0100 Bas Couwenberg <sebas...@xs4all.nl> >> | wrote: >> | > An uncoordinated transition to GSL 2.0 has started in unstable. >> | >> | please file RC bugs against the packages that have a versioned B-D on >> | libgsl0-dev (since that will not be satisfied by the Provides in >> | libgsl-dev). >> >> Good idea. > > The automatically generated transition tracker needs a small improvement > to handle libgsl0-dev too. Currently it marks all packages as bad that > depend on libgsl0-dev (with or without version requirement), but since > libgsl0-dev is provided by the new libgsl-dev only packages with a > versioned dependency on libgsl0-dev need to marked as bad. > > The attached ben configuration implements the above. It correctly marks > pktools (2.6.4-4) as good, its -dev package depends on libgsl0-dev > without a version requirement, and its other binary package depend on > the new libgsl2. > > @Release Team, can you update the gsl transition tracker? That didn't seem to work well. I have created one that seems to work: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gsl.html Cheers, Emilio
