Your message dated Sat, 31 Oct 2015 21:49:06 +0100
with message-id <56352942....@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#803610: nmu: coinor-csdp_6.1.1-1 dsdp_5.8-9.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #803610,
regarding nmu: coinor-csdp_6.1.1-1 dsdp_5.8-9.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
803610: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803610
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Dear Release Team,
During the Wheezy release cycle, the libblas3gf package was renamed libblas3
(and similarly liblapack3gf->liblapack3, libatlas3gf-base->libatlas3-base).
Since there was no ABI change, the transition was achieved using transitional
packages and symlinks on shared libraries (but no mass-rebuild).
I'd like to finally remove the transitional packages. Almost all reverse
dependencies have been naturally fixed through the course of uploads. Only two
packages are left (since they have not seen uploads for years). Would it be
possible to binNMU them?
nmu coinor-csdp_6.1.1-1 . amd64 armel i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips
mipsel powerpc s390x . unstable . -m "Rebuild for libblas3gf->libblas3
transition"
nmu dsdp_5.8-9.1 . amd64 armel armhf hurd-i386 i386 kfreebsd-i386
kfreebsd-amd64 mips mipsel powerpc s390x . unstable . -m "Rebuild for
libblas3gf->libblas3 transition"
Thanks,
--
.''`. Sébastien Villemot
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' http://sebastien.villemot.name
`- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 31/10/15 20:50, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> During the Wheezy release cycle, the libblas3gf package was renamed libblas3
> (and similarly liblapack3gf->liblapack3, libatlas3gf-base->libatlas3-base).
> Since there was no ABI change, the transition was achieved using transitional
> packages and symlinks on shared libraries (but no mass-rebuild).
>
> I'd like to finally remove the transitional packages. Almost all reverse
> dependencies have been naturally fixed through the course of uploads. Only two
> packages are left (since they have not seen uploads for years). Would it be
> possible to binNMU them?
>
> nmu coinor-csdp_6.1.1-1 . amd64 armel i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips
> mipsel powerpc s390x . unstable . -m "Rebuild for libblas3gf->libblas3
> transition"
> nmu dsdp_5.8-9.1 . amd64 armel armhf hurd-i386 i386 kfreebsd-i386
> kfreebsd-amd64 mips mipsel powerpc s390x . unstable . -m "Rebuild for
> libblas3gf->libblas3 transition"
Sure, scheduled.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
