On 23.07.2015 17:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2015-07-23 16:41, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> On 2015-07-23 15:49, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >>> By the way, do you know why vtk6 is shown as bad in the transition tracker, >>> even though it built successfully with ffmpeg? >> >> Because building successfully doesn't mean building sanely. >> >> Package: libvtk6.1 >> Source: vtk6 (6.1.0+dfsg2-6) >> Version: 6.1.0+dfsg2-6+b1 > > Specifically, I got the right reason but the wrong reason for it. :-) > > It's still bad because libvtk6.1 is still in sid. And libvtk6.1 is still > in sid because of the mess that is the vtk6 "transition" (#749395, which > has been going on for over a year now).
Ah, that explains it. There is a vtk6.1 -> vtk6.2 transition [1] going on in the middle of the vtk -> vtk6 transition [2]. Maybe scheduling binNMUs for the packages depending on libvtk6.1 (gammaray, liggghts, mia, nifti2dicom, therion) would help? Best regards, Andreas 1: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-vtk6.html 2: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/vtk6.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55b1119f.6000...@googlemail.com
