On Sat, 2015-05-30 at 10:49 +0000, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: [...] > >And I've just had to ask ftp-master to do more manual work to get the > >amd64 buildd upload accepted in to the archive (currently pending on > >someone having chance to do so). > > >We've discussed this on IRC and it was mentioned in my recent dda post - > >if you're not uploading amd64 binaries, _please_ stop calling > >the .changes file that you upload to stable "_amd64.changes". > > > Your work is so much appreciated. > > I read your dda post, but this seems to clash with what ftp members > told us a while ago [1] (or does just pu uploads > behave differently from unstable ones?).
We cleared this up briefly on IRC earlier today, but for the record the potential for name clashes affects any suite which uses a policy queue as part of processing uploads - so at least the {,old}stable, backports and security suites. As you mentioned, the case where this used to be a problem for other suites was resolved a while ago, but where a policy queue is involved, dak keeps the .changes files around - you can see this by looking at e.g. dists/proposed-updates on an ftp.d.o mirror - so there's still the potential for clashes in those cases. It sounds like ftp-master are looking at potential ways of making this not be a problem for much longer, but that's the situation right now. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1432987712.1901.5.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk