On 04/05/15 13:34, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Owner: pkg-xfce-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi, > > we'd like to upload Xfce 4.12 to unstable. It currently sits in > experimental since few weeks, and seems to work just fine. > > There's a soname transition (libxfce4util6 to libxfce4util7) so it'll > need some binNMUs, and as always the xfce4-panel plugins need to be > rebuilt against the new panel to get the correct dependencies/conflicts. > This time plugins built against xfce4-panel 4.10 should work with > xfce4-panel 4.12, but we don't know about the future so we keep the > shlibs like this for now. > > The ben file generated by reportbug was wrong because the xfce4-panel > package is not renamed and we need to check the version, so I edited it > manually following the Xfce 4.10 ben file but it might still be wrong. > > Thanks in advance and congrats for the Jessie release! > > Ben file: > > title = "xfce 4.12"; > is_affected = .depends ~ "libxfce4util6" | .build-depends ~ "xfce4-panel-dev" > | .depends ~ "libxfce4util7"; > is_good = .depends ~ "libxfce4util7" | .depends ~ "xfce4-panel (<< 4.11)"; > is_bad = .depends ~ "libxfce4util6" | .depends ~ "xfce4-panel (>= 4.11)";
The xfce4-panel tests seem inverted. Have you done test rebuilds for the libxfce4util rdeps? Regards, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55477301.4070...@debian.org
