On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Niels Thykier <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2015-04-13 13:22, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Andreas Beckmann <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Please enhance the release.debian.org binNMU reporting functionality to ask >>> for the release where the binNMU should be performed. The question >>> should default to sid similarily to the ftp.debian.org RM template >>> questions. >> >> This seems like a valid request for me, but I'm adding release.d.o >> team in the loop to seek for their input too. >> >> Regards, >> > > Hi Sandro, > > Sounds like a fine idea for me.
That's great! now, last doubt: what type of suites are allowed in the nmu command? Andreas mentioned some (other than the default 'unstable'): * experimental * $STABLE-backports * $STABLE-proposed-updates * $STABLE are there any other acceptable? is $STABLE 'stable' or 'wheezy' (the former is preferred - from my POV - to avoid to update the suites list at each release)? No binnmu in testing? so, really, what should I put in this suites menu?! :) Thanks & Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cab4xwxyjk+fmzktfoddb03jwjua918ak__qspcrhwweypwd...@mail.gmail.com
