+++ Adam D. Barratt [2015-03-24 19:55 +0000]: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 23:06 +0000, Wookey wrote: > > Please unblock package cross-binutils (source) > [...] > > The cross-binutils package versions should match the binutils versions > > so that cross-building and native building are consistent. > > > > This was the case in Jessie until binutils 2.25-5 migrated to testing > > (on 2015-03-06) replacing 2.24.90.20141023-1
> Unblocks are source-based; one can't unblock binary packages (nor would > it make much sense). Right, I thought so, but reportbug said it had never heard of the package and thus confused me. (So I thought maybe it wanted binaries, so I made a list in case that was helpful). and it should now be: unblock cross-binutils/0.23 > --- cross-binutils-0.14/buildpackage 2014-10-24 09:13:47.000000000 +0000 > +++ cross-binutils-0.23/buildpackage 2015-03-23 23:16:33.000000000 +0000 > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ > # needs git-buildpackage and sbuild (outside the chroot) > # and lsb-release inside the chroot > > -chroot=unstable-amd64-cross-sbuild > +chroot=unstable-amd64-sbuild > > That change doesn't appear to be mentioned anywhere in the changelog > afaics. That script is just a maintainer's convenience script for doing the release build in the right chroot, tagging git etc, without making usual human errors. It's not something that is used in a normal (dpkg-buildpackage) build of the package. I changed the chroot name so that it would work for most people using sbuild-createchroot chroots (i.e default chroot naming), rather than just for me with my oddly-named chroot. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150325041601.gr10...@halon.org.uk
