Your message dated Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:46:19 -0500
with message-id
<CANTw=MNoHNtDjV7ax1ZE=vpX=hxs8-gpa46hataeomlhewh...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#771944: Following FusionForge 5.3 stable branch
has caused the Debian Bug report #771944,
regarding Following FusionForge 5.3 stable branch
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
771944: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771944
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
We're (upstream-ly) maintaining a stable branch for FusionForge,
called "5.3", which the Debian package currently follows.
(incidentally Lolando and I are both upstream and debian devs)
We're currently pushing only bugfixes to this branch (some of them
qualify as "RC", some don't), because it's deployed at several large
client installs already and we want to make sure we don't break
anything.
It makes sense that users benefit from the quality of this branch, so
we'd like to know to what extent following this branch is compatible
with the Freeze.
Cheers!
Sylvain
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 5:12 AM:
> I already read the policy, and since it sounds sensible to follow the
> upstream Stable branch for the debian Stable release, I'm asking.
It looks like your fontforge updates were accepted into testing.
Best wishes,
Mike
--- End Message ---
