Looks like both src:db5.3 and src:cyrus-imapd-2.4 needs testing-pu. db5.3 due gcc-defaults, src:cyrus-imapd-2.4 due libical.
I will prepare db5.3_5.3.28-7+deb8u2 and cyrus-imapd-2.4_2.4.17+caldav~beta10-12+deb8u1 and upload when you ack it. OK? Cheers, Ondrej On Tue, Dec 30, 2014, at 18:28, Ivo De Decker wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 03:38:46PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > nmu db5.3_5.3.28-7~deb8u1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild with dpkg >= 1.17.22 to bump > > the ${misc:Pre-Depends} on dpkg to 1.17.14" > > This is actually a binnmu in jessie, so this syntax is wrong. It would > also > need a binnmu in unstable, as version 5.3.28-7 has the same issue. > > > This covers just my packages where I use relative symlink_targets in > > dpkg-maintscript-helper calls. This should fix RC bug #773806. > > Could you update #773806 with the info about the cause of the issue (and > re-upgrade the severity to serious). > > It can't be fixed with a binnmu, however, as the issue is in > libdb5.3-java, > which is arch all, so it needs a sourcefull upload. So please start by > uploading to unstable. Once that's done, we can look at the t-p-u. > > > nmu cyrus-imapd-2.4_2.4.17+caldav~beta10-12 . ALL . -m "Rebuild with dpkg > > >= 1.17.22 to bump the ${misc:Pre-Depends} on dpkg to 1.17.14" > > I don't know which packages are affected by this issue, but > cyrus-imapd-2.4 > produces a number of arch all binaries with pre-depends on dpkg, so if > they > are affected by this issue, a sourcefull upload is necessary as well. > > > Perhaps you can binNMU all packages that has ${misc:Pre-Depends}, has > > B-D on dpkg in d/control and uses symlink_to_dir or dir_to_symlink. > > Ping me if you want a deeper analysis what's needed. > > These issues probably aren't discovered by recent piuparts testing for > the > wheezy -> jessie upgrade path, as the pre-depends on dpkg (>= 1.17.5) > causes > the installation of dpkg from jessie, which is newer than 1.17.14 in > recent > tests. This also means this issue only affects people upgrading from > older > versions of jessie to newer ones, not from wheezy to jessie. > > I suspect older instances of this issue (when dpkg 1.17.14 wasn't > released > yet, and relative symlinks weren't supported by dpkg-maintscript-helper) > will > have been caught by piuparts before, and fixed at that point (by using > absolute paths), so I don't know if this is a big issue. > > If you want to investigate this issue further, it would probably be > necessary > to filter out the packages using relative paths with symlink_to_dir or > dir_to_symlink only, as there is no issue when using absolute paths. Once > there is a list, we can look at the size of the problem, and whether we > want > to fix it for jessie. > > Cheers, > > Ivo > -- Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1420552294.277846.210190281.29501...@webmail.messagingengine.com