Your message dated Sat, 13 Dec 2014 20:26:01 +0000
with message-id <20141213202601.gk17...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#773034: nmu: tulip_4.6.0dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #773034,
regarding nmu: tulip_4.6.0dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
773034: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773034
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu tulip_4.6.0dfsg-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new binutils."
As ususally after a new binutils upload ...
Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 02:47:21PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> nmu tulip_4.6.0dfsg-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new binutils."
>
> As ususally after a new binutils upload ...
Scheduled.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
