On 2014-11-29 11:30, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2014-11-29 at 07:41 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2014-11-27 "Adam D. Barratt" <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 19:19 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > nmu libgcrypt20_1.6.2-4 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libgpg-error >= 1.17-1 for 
stricter package dependency. Closes: #771100"

> Scheduled.
[...]

Thanks.

Something is wrong here. All buildds picked the package for rebuild,
but all are now stuck in status "building" for 1d 11h. libgcrypt20
should only take about 3 minutes on e.g. amd64.

They're unlikely to still be building; it's more likely that there was a
problem with the build that means things crashed rather than failing
nicely. The i386 buildd at least has tried building 20 further packages
since the point it started building libgcrypt20.

I've asked on IRC if someone can have a look at what happened with the
builds.

Thanks to Samuel Thibault, it appears that the problem is due to wanna-build loading the binNMU message as part of a YAML structure and failing on the ":" in "Closes:". It'd be nice if it didn't accept them in that case, but never mind. After adjusting the message, the binNMUs are now building.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/d6316eb0d8226025f98e33b23d0f2...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org

Reply via email to