On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 23:38:37 +0000 Jonathan Wiltshire <j...@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 03:39:56PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On Friday, November 28, 2014 08:17:26 PM Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > > Control: tag -1 confirmed moreinfo > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 07:29:46PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > > Upstream is in the process of preparing a new feature release that is > > > > clearly unsuitable for the freeze, but it also contains quite a few > > > > bug fixes that are either important from a correct performance (and > > > > potentially security) perspective or very low risk and highly likely to > > > > be useful to sysadmins making use of the package. > > > > > > > > I've gone through and evaluated which changes I think would be good > > > > to get into Jessie (see attached upstream diff). Depending on upstream's > > > > reaction to this, this would either be version 2.9.3 or patches to our > > > > existing 2.9.2. Before I approach upstream and push for another bug fix > > > > release that they don't currently plan, I'd like feedback on what, if any > > > > of the attached would be suitable for Jessie. > > > > > > All the proposed changes look fine to me. How do you want to proceed? > > > > Given the closeness to the important fix deadline, I'll just upload a patched > > 2.9.2. > > Ok, please remove the moreinfo tag when it's ready for processing.
Done. Also note that since we're doing this as a patch to 2.9.2 rather than a new upstream, it'll be: unblock opendkim/2.9.2-2 Thanks, Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/2877590.rgtvT52lie@kitterman-optiplex-9020m
