Hello, Here the answer of the taurus upstream (he forgot to CC the the bts) Carlos Pascual [cpasc...@cells.es]
Hi Fred and Jonathan, First of all, sorry for the late reply (I hope it is still relevant). I am currently out of office and with limited email access. If you require further info, please contact my colleague Zbigniew Reszela <zresz...@cells.es> (I cc'ed him) As Fred mentioned I (and Zbigniew) personally reviewed all the contributions of this latest release of Taurus and Sardana. I must say that the review process for these changes was just as strict as the one we routinely use for all releases: - publication and code review of patches on a developer's list - approval of patches after code review by an authorized reviewer - passing automatic unit testing - passing a battery of manual interactive tests (checklist). - On top of that, I personally use the development branch routinely on a Debian Jessie. With this I just want to convey that this release is, in my (and Zbigniew's) opinion much better for Jessie than the previous one, since the review process was no different from that of previous releases and the changes are essentially bug fixes. I hope this helped, Carlos Do you need more informations ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/a2a20ec3b8560d408356cac2fc148e53b1fce...@sun-dag3.synchrotron-soleil.fr
