On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 03:52:52PM +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> Hi Darryl,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Darryl L. Pierce <mcpie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Please unblock package qpid-proton
> >
> > The reason it failed to build from source was due to it having a dependency 
> > on libsslcommon2-dev. However, this dependency can instead by met by 
> > libssl-dev which does exist in Jessie.
>
>  You may misunderstand something here. Package qpid-proton _is part of
> Jessie_[1] (see that the version number of unstable [Sid] and testing
> [Jessie] is the same). If the package can depend on libsslcommon2-dev
> or libssl-dev then it should be declared as is. Lucas already
> mentioned that you should fix it via Sid[2]. However I don't see any
> action about it, not even in the Git repository of the package[3]. Do
> I overlook something?
> 
> Cheers,
> Laszlo/GCS
> [1] https://packages.qa.debian.org/q/qpid-proton.html
> [2] 
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-middleware-maintainers/Week-of-Mon-20141110/000040.html
> [3] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-middleware/qpid-proton.git

No, it was my bad as I had only been pushing changes to mentors and not
to the git repo for qpid-proton.git. However, I'm now tracking that git
repo (I was only pushing to my github.com repo for packaging chagnes)
but can't seem to push into it.

-- 
Darryl L. Pierce <mcpie...@gmail.com>
http://mcpierce.blogspot.com/
Famous last words:
   "I wonder what happens if we do it this way?"

Attachment: pgp0ogYMlNRv4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to