Your message dated Fri, 7 Nov 2014 16:59:42 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#768472: unblock: netcfg/1.123
has caused the Debian Bug report #768472,
regarding unblock: netcfg/1.123
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
768472: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768472
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package netcfg, which fixes a missing bound check in a
nameserver array:
| netcfg (1.123) unstable; urgency=medium
|
| * Fix missing bounds check on nameserver array iteration, leading to a
| crash when 4 (or more) nameservers are available (Closes: #768218).
| Thanks, Kjell Braden, for the bug report, patch, and tests!
|
| -- Cyril Brulebois <[email protected]> Thu, 06 Nov 2014 13:49:31 +0100
Probably a candidate for p-u but nothing too dramatic, or urgent.
unblock netcfg/1.123
I'm told the current d-i RM is OK with an unblock-udeb.
Mraw,
KiBi.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 16:54:12 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package netcfg, which fixes a missing bound check in a
> nameserver array:
>
> | netcfg (1.123) unstable; urgency=medium
> |
> | * Fix missing bounds check on nameserver array iteration, leading to a
> | crash when 4 (or more) nameservers are available (Closes: #768218).
> | Thanks, Kjell Braden, for the bug report, patch, and tests!
> |
> | -- Cyril Brulebois <[email protected]> Thu, 06 Nov 2014 13:49:31 +0100
>
> Probably a candidate for p-u but nothing too dramatic, or urgent.
>
> unblock netcfg/1.123
>
> I'm told the current d-i RM is OK with an unblock-udeb.
>
unblocked
Cheers,
Julien
--- End Message ---
