On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 23:26 +0200, Gilles Filippini wrote: > [resending because of a previously malformed address] > > Hi, > > On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 11:22:03 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > <po...@debian.org> wrote: > > On 12/06/14 21:51, Gilles Filippini wrote: > > > nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . amd64 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . stable . -m > > > "Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy (closes: #739261)" > > > > > > Hoping to get it right this time :/ > > > > Scheduled. This still needs to be accepted by the SRMs for the next point > > release. > > I fail to see any move on this side.
Then your vision is faulty. > Is there anything I could do to > have this binNMU accepted into stable? Travel back to July this year, when the update was released. See https://www.debian.org/News/2014/20140712 and libhdf5-7 | 1.8.8-9 | stable | armel, armhf, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc libhdf5-7 | 1.8.8-9+b1 | stable | amd64, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1409867486.12803.16.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
