On 30/08/14 15:11, Eric Maeker wrote: > Le 29/08/2014 14:17, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : >> On 28/08/14 23:43, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> To whom is this question directed? If to me: I personally have time >>> but to get freemedforms surely into Jessie I would not wait to long. >> >> I want this fixed ASAP or else I'll kick it out of testing as this is >> starting >> to block other things. > > I understand. > >> No pressure on upstream. You can just fix it in sid for now even if you don't >> fix the non-free stuff yet. > > Currently, I've corrected the 0.9.0 package, it now builds with a dual > Qt installation. I'm preparing a 0.9.2 release (as upstream) without any > non-fully-free-js-file (end of next week max). Package already build > fine. I'm testing some functionalities of the new version of apps right now. > > I want to insist that this JS file is related to the dokuwiki project > which was used to create the usermanual local html file (it is an open > source project). There aren't any non-free code inside the FreeMedForms > project package. And it is fully functionnal as is. I'm working on a new > exporter for the wiki to provide a 100% DFSG compatible extraction for > the 1.0.0 release (end 2014). > > Thank you pointing out, previously ignored, non-free JS file. And thanks > a lot for giving me the opportunity to provide, as quickly as possible, > a new freemedforms-project source code.
OK, maybe I wasn't clear enough. What I need right now is an upload of freemedforms-project that build depends on libquazip-dev, instead of the (no longer existent) libquazip0-dev. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/540210a1.6080...@debian.org
