On 2014-05-20 Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 19:47:48 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] >> Afaik it is not possible to change the versioning scheme and move from >> soname.1 foo@0 bar@1 baz@1 >> to >> soname.1 foo@1 bar@1 baz@1 >> without breaking the ABI, is it?
> Yep. So we would need to change the binary package name and do a soname bump, correct? > I wonder if building gnutls with -Bsymbolic wouldn't already be an > improvement, by avoiding internal calls getting resolved to the wrong > lib... Thinking about gnutls_init or the fact that some functions now support more algoritms I don't think that would be enough. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140524070312.gb2...@downhill.g.la
