On 11 April 2014 03:11, Steve M. Robbins <s...@debian.org> wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > As previously requested on Feb 28 2014 (see > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704032#220): > > 1.55 has been in testing for a month now and has somewhat better > support for recent glibc -- e.g. it doesn't suffer from .#739807 > and #739904. > > I'd like to switch the boost-defaults to 1.55. > > Julien Cristau today requested that I file a new bug > (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704032#230). >
I've went ahead with this transition in Ubuntu and honestly there is nothing scary about it, just binNMUs and/or source-ful uploads to bump build-dependencies. I did uncover a couple of FTBFS, but they were just general FTBFS not induced by boost changes. Can I go ahead with boost-defaults upload to unstable? Regards, Dimitri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CANBHLUh4Qdt11Uz_5jx12Y_=yorbpdzkqTP-9f=2donbnbs...@mail.gmail.com
