On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 02:24:24PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] > I'm slightly torn on this one. Whilst the patch seems "obviously > correct", it's not applied to the package in unstable, which is > usually a requirement for accepting a patch for stable. There's an > argument that it's unlikely that anyone will try to update from > squeeze's sympa to jessie's without having upgraded perl in between, > but conversely the patch should work fine with the package in > unstable. > > Are there any plans to apply the patch, or otherwise update the > package, in unstable?
This fix apply on a Debian patch[1] which has been merged upstream[2] in sympa 6.1.19 and the fix itself was applied a few commits later[3]. I'm currently working on the packaging of sympa 6.1.20. It should be ready to be uploaded in unstable within the next few days. [1] http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/sympa/6.1.11~dfsg-5/1011_fix_sqlite_db_upgrade [2] https://sourcesup.renater.fr/scm/viewvc.php/branches/sympa-6.1-branch/src/lib/Upgrade.pm?root=sympa&r1=9974&r2=9995 [3] https://sourcesup.renater.fr/scm/viewvc.php/branches/sympa-6.1-branch/src/lib/Upgrade.pm?root=sympa&r1=9996&r2=10003 Regards, M. -- Emmanuel Bouthenot mail: kolter@{openics,debian}.org gpg: 4096R/0x929D42C3 xmpp: kol...@im.openics.org irc: kolter@{freenode,oftc} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140417214604.ga...@openics.org