On 2014-02-05 Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> wrote:
> Control: tags -1 pending

> On 2014-02-01 13:30, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> Afaict binNMUs should start with packages with direct b-d on
>> libtasn1-3-dev. The rebuilds should be triggered in three stages, with
>> stage #2 only starting after #1 has completed and #3 after that.

> Noted

>> #1
>> nmu gnutls26_2.12.23-10 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild for libtasn1-6 transition.'
>> #2
>> nmu libimobiledevice_1.0.2-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild for libtasn1-6 transition.'

> I think you mean libimobiledevice_1.1.5-2 ?  1.0.2-3 would be somewhere
> "between" oldstable and stable.

You are right. I honestly do not know how that version number got in.

[...]
> Scheduled to here.

>> #3
>> nmu gnome-keyring_3.8.2-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild for libtasn1-6 transition.'

Afaict only gnome-keyring (just to be on the safe side, it has a
build-dependency on libtasn1-3-dev although the binary packages do not
depend on libtasn1-3.) and csync2 binNMUs are missing. After that I
can ask for removal from unstable and testing.

nmu csync2_1.34-2.2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild for libtasn1-6 transition.'

Thanks,
cu Andreas

-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140207182013.gb3...@downhill.g.la

Reply via email to