On 2014-02-05 Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> wrote: > Control: tags -1 pending
> On 2014-02-01 13:30, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] >> Afaict binNMUs should start with packages with direct b-d on >> libtasn1-3-dev. The rebuilds should be triggered in three stages, with >> stage #2 only starting after #1 has completed and #3 after that. > Noted >> #1 >> nmu gnutls26_2.12.23-10 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild for libtasn1-6 transition.' >> #2 >> nmu libimobiledevice_1.0.2-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild for libtasn1-6 transition.' > I think you mean libimobiledevice_1.1.5-2 ? 1.0.2-3 would be somewhere > "between" oldstable and stable. You are right. I honestly do not know how that version number got in. [...] > Scheduled to here. >> #3 >> nmu gnome-keyring_3.8.2-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild for libtasn1-6 transition.' Afaict only gnome-keyring (just to be on the safe side, it has a build-dependency on libtasn1-3-dev although the binary packages do not depend on libtasn1-3.) and csync2 binNMUs are missing. After that I can ask for removal from unstable and testing. nmu csync2_1.34-2.2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild for libtasn1-6 transition.' Thanks, cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140207182013.gb3...@downhill.g.la