Hi, Thanks for your ping. And sorry, reply was late. I am working about this.
Best regards, Nobuhiro 2014-01-22 intrigeri <intrig...@debian.org>: > Hi, > > Cyril Brulebois wrote (07 Oct 2013 08:41:17 GMT) : >> Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwama...@debian.org> (2013-10-07): >>> I'd like to propose an upgrade of opencv. >>> >>> opencv distributed in wheezy includes source code of non-free (#724920). >>> I want to solve this problem. >>> Source code of the target is the code for test. It does not affect the >>> actual working. >>> >>> I attached debdiff. Could you consider this change suitable for >>> stable-proposed-updates? > >> (for the records, we usually prefer when bugs are fixed in testing / >> unstable before considering updates in stable.) Anyway, if the files >> indeed got relicensed under a suitable license, why should they get >> removed from an earlier release? At best we could ship a package with >> updated headers and licensing info to reflect the facts all those files >> are actually OK? > > Ping? > > Regards, > -- > intrigeri > | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc > | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org} GPG ID: 40AD1FA6 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cabmqnvj3_-p0-q-jzahrujkikx0sfhcm2zdznnmob1ekkxp...@mail.gmail.com
