On 21/01/14 20:10, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2014-01-21 19:45, Andreas Tille wrote: >> I know that qiime has a serious bug (#731190) where I was seeking for >> help six weeks ago with no real result. So I would have expected to >> become kicked from testing because of this bug which would be fine.
Please, please Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org for help with something like this. I only noticed that bug today because I happen to read -release@ > Now, by the looks of it, this FTBFS has not been filed. For that, I > believe you have suffered from the problem mentioned in [2]. > """On a related note, I suspect a good part of this problem would go > away if we had an automated tool to deal with the case where a > (sid-only) FTBFS is ignored. It happens sometimes that the maintainer > does nothing (or, maybe, does not realise the package FTBFS on arch X) > and neither the porters nor the buildd admins filed a bug for it. That would be extremely useful, and even better if it could Cc: porters of that arch and/or apply relevant BTS (user)tags. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52ded6bb.5050...@pyro.eu.org