On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 16:50 +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: > the debdiff is huge because some files for the config get regenerated, there > also is a huge patch on a configure script that is automatically generated. > > Luckily in the new version I managed to remove all of this, but since I just > want to apply a fix to an old version I figure I shouldn't change too much, > or > I'd just upload the same version that already is in sid...
Thanks; and, yes, minimal changes are very much the preference for stable updates. The debdiff's not /that/ bad: config.guess | 1177 ++++++++++++++++----------------------- config.sub | 588 ++++--------------- debian/patches/0009-TCPMUX.patch | 11 xinetd-2.3.14/debian/changelog | 7 xinetd-2.3.14/debian/control | 2 xinetd-2.3.14/debian/rules | 4 xinetd/inet.c | 4 7 files changed, 634 insertions(+), 1159 deletions(-) My only query is this hunk from inet.c: --- xinetd-2.3.14/xinetd/inet.c +++ xinetd-2.3.14.orig/xinetd/inet.c @@ -23,10 +23,6 @@ #include "parsesup.h" #include "nvlists.h" -static psi_h iter ; - -extern int inetd_ipv6; That doesn't appear to be part of the CVE fix as far as I can tell? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1380985630.9262.68.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
