On 09/11/2013 06:02 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 05:06:03PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > Hi, > two more testing removals related to the libav9 transition: > > - libavg 1.7.1-3 fails to build for unrelated boost reasons. Popcon is > virtually non-existant.
Well the patch for boost problem is uploaded into debian (built in a jessie chroot / against older libav that is). Such that to prevent erroneous FTBFS attribution to earlier boost failure in the build process. This was available since August 27th in Ubuntu, but not uploaded into debian as I couldn't build the package in sid as it FTBFS against libav 9. Unfortunately I'm not familiar with libav API changes to port libavg, I'll poke upstream about it, but at the moment I'm tagging "libavg FTBFS against libav 9" bug with "help". Is there a libav 9 porting guide available somewhere? Or can someone help out with a patch to fix libav 9 FTBFS? Also, why did libavg was removed from testing? Was it actually blocking any removals from the archive and/or transitions? As far as I can see all libraries that libavg binaries are linked against are still present in sid. This haste removal seems inconsistent to me w.r.t. how other transitions & library removals are handled by the release team. ps. Popcon is virtually non-existant because virtually libavg has only been recently reintroduced in debian after having been away for a long time. Regards, Dmitrijs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/canbhluhj_cv+fgjyqx5s7osxql2m41d8-qgkgzckxygzian...@mail.gmail.com
