Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 18:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 02:36 +0100, Olly Betts wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 07:26:39PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > What version were you proposing to use for the re-repack?
> > 
> > I'm open to guidance as to what's best.
> > 
> > The repacked upstream tarball would be the same as testing/unstable has,
> > so perhaps 0.4.2.dfsg.2-1~deb7+1 (and 0.4.2.dfsg.2-1~deb6+1 for opu)?
> 
> ~deb7u1 and ~deb6u1 would be more consistent with our usual numbering
> policy (well, for wheezy, but ~squeeze wouldn't really work in this
> case).

Flagged for acceptance; thanks.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1373724502.29185.12.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org

Reply via email to