On Sun, 2013-06-16 at 14:10 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 at 09:38:02 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > Does the RT have any opinion on which of the possible resolutions would > > be acceptable/preferred for stable? > > In the absence of feedback,
Sorry; I've been somewhat distracted sorting out the point release recently. > and done this one: > > > * upload 0.1.16 to wheezy-backports (which should be trivial), > > and upload 0.1.11-2+deb7u1 with a NEWS file noting the regression > > and suggesting the backport > > Assuming my backport gets accepted into wheezy-backports, does the > attached debdiff look OK? Yes, thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1371406294.4672.9.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
