Hi Jay Disclaimer, I'm not part of the release team but have only one comment on the message below:
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 02:55:40PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > It's been a few weeks since my original post about the libtiff > transition, and I haven't heard any responses. While I appreciate that > this is not at the top of your long list, I would really appreciate some > kind of response if only an indication that you've got it on your list > and will prioritize it when you have a chance. Mainly I'm interested to > know whether you think my plan is sound and whether you have any idea > when we might be able to move forward. > > In the mean time, I'm going to move forward with uploading new versions, > etc., without changing the current packaging scheme since I don't want > to make a change that will make things harder than necessary. In my > original message, I mentioned the versions that would be part of the > transition, so clearly those versions are going to change now. I just > don't want anyone to think that I have given up waiting and am going to > push forward. Thanks. The problem might be the following: debian-release has quite big amount of traffic and your message might be gone under. You can open a bugreport against release.debian.org so that the transition can be documented in the BTS, see examples in [1]. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=release.debian.org;dist=unstable#_0_5_4 Regards, Salvatore -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130602191728.GA12474@elende
