Argh, i reply only to message about copyrights, but do not reply to this. В Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:55:41 +0000 Jonathan Wiltshire <j...@debian.org> пишет:
> Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 02:55:54AM +0400, Alexander Golovko wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Please, unblock bacula-doc/5.2.6-2.
> > This is change in major version, but this will fix situation, that
> > we ship in wheezy different versions of package and documentation
> > (package 5.2.6 and docs for 5.0.2).
>
> Whilst I agree that we should have same versions of the package and
> documentation, and I'd be more leniant that usual given that it's
> "just" documentation, there are problems that mean I'm not prepared
> to unblock this version.
>
> > +bacula-doc (5.2.6-2) unstable; urgency=low
>
> You aren't listed in Uploaders or Maintainers, so this should be an
> NMU version number and have a note in the changelog.
Package maintainer is Debian Bacula Team, i'm one of members of this
team.
>
> > +bacula-doc (5.2.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
> > +
> > + [ Alexander Golovko ]
> > + * debian/patches/remove-config-generated-file-in-source.patch,
> > + debian/patches/series, debian/rules,
> > debian/source.lintian-overrides:
> > + + change method for remove config.{log,status} from sources.
>
> Why? Apart from the ick of using quilt to remove this file, you now
> have to update that patch every time the file changes, which is
> probably every upstream release. Was there a problem caused by the
> previous behaviour?
This is a fix for error 'aborting due to unexpected upstream changes',
when try to build package by "git-buildpackage --git-pbuilder".
Upstream was informed about this files and new versions ships without
it, so we will not be require to change this patch every new upstream
version.
>
> > + * Bump standards to 3.9.4 (no changes).
> > + * debian/compat: bump to 9.
> > + debian/control: set dpendency debhelper to >9.
>
> These are a definite 'no' (although I realise the dependency was
> reverted).
Ok, standards bumping will be reverted for wheezy, all other changes
already was reverted.
--
with best regards,
Alexander Golovko
email: alexan...@ankalagon.ru
xmpp: alexan...@ankalagon.ru
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
