Your message dated Sun, 03 Mar 2013 22:26:44 +0000
with message-id <1362349604.11072.56.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#696671: tpu: isc-dhcp/4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u3
has caused the Debian Bug report #696671,
regarding tpu: isc-dhcp/4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
696671: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696671
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: tpu
Severity: normal
I plan to upload a tpu for isc-dhcp fixing two important issues. One
fixes an unclean error situation, and the other sets up the default
dhclient configuration to work in ipv6-only configurations. The first
change is less important, so I can drop it if needed. Please review
the proposed patch attached.
Thanks,
Mike
isc-dhcp.patch
Description: Binary data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 23:22 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> (28/02/2013):
> > Unblocked, but needs a d-i ack.
>
> AFAICT netcfg is the only consumer on the d-i side, on non-Linux ports
> only. isc-dhcp-client-udeb doesn't come with dhcp hooks anyway, and a
> better upgrade handling shouldn't hurt anything in d-i; I don't think
> there's any objection to unblocking it.
Thanks; unblock-udebbed.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
