Hi Adam, Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> writes: > Therefore, I will now build it on armhf, which will take around a day. Update: the armhf build failed because about 100 testcases fail.
I have no clue on how to fix this and can’t spend much more time on debugging this either. Given that the 3.0 version works — it passed all the clang tests and can compile non-trivial software on armhf and amd64 — can we just upload that? Or, as a last resort, re-introduce 3.0 in unstable, even if switching to an epoch is ugly? -- Best regards, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/x6obfwhx23....@midna.zekjur.net