Hi Adam,

Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> writes:
> Therefore, I will now build it on armhf, which will take around a day.
Update: the armhf build failed because about 100 testcases fail.

I have no clue on how to fix this and can’t spend much more time on
debugging this either.

Given that the 3.0 version works — it passed all the clang tests and can
compile non-trivial software on armhf and amd64 — can we just upload
that? Or, as a last resort, re-introduce 3.0 in unstable, even if
switching to an epoch is ugly?

-- 
Best regards,
Michael


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/x6obfwhx23....@midna.zekjur.net

Reply via email to