Your message dated Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:13:43 +0000
with message-id <20130206111343.ga19...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#692506: unblock: chocolate-doom/1.7.0-2 (but please
see inside!)
has caused the Debian Bug report #692506,
regarding unblock: chocolate-doom/1.7.0-2 (but please see inside!)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
692506: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692506
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I've just uploaded chocolate-doom/1.7.0-2, with one fix, a documentation
fix only:
> * Add myself back to uploaders.
1.7.0-1 has no humans in Maintainer and no Uploaders which is a policy
violation.
HOWEVER!
There are a number of other documentation problems in chocolate-doom which
I could fix, if the release team would approve them for wheezy. They are:
> obsolete-field-in-dep5-copyright maintainer upstream-contact (paragraph at
> line 1)
> obsolete-field-in-dep5-copyright name upstream-name (paragraph at line 1)
> obsolete-field-in-dep5-copyright format-specification format (paragraph at
> line 1)
> comma-separated-files-in-dep5-copyright paragraph at line 19
> missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright public domain (paragraph at line
> 69)
> duplicate-changelog-files usr/share/doc/chocolate-doom/ChangeLog.gz
> usr/share/doc/chocolate-doom/changelog.gz
If the release team would be prepared to accept fixes for the above into
wheezy, I'll do a -3 upload to unstable fixing them all. Please only unblock
-2 if you are happy to fix the Uploaders issue *but not* any of the above.
FINALLY!
I could also fix
> out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.1 (current is 3.9.3)
at the same time, which is almost certainly only a documentation fix too,
but for some reason I'd be more hesitant to do that.
Thank you in advance.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:44:53AM +0000, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 10:24:03PM +0000, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > Yes, I'll take those too.
>
> Thanks Jonathan, upload made.
>
Unblocked.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
