On 2012-12-27 22:17, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > intrigeri wrote (25 Nov 2012 08:39:49 GMT) : >> intrigeri wrote (10 Nov 2012 15:27:12 GMT) : >>> How hard would it be to backport the --disable-x509 option into >>> current testing's gpa? > > It seems that this is part of upstream Git commit 61e00549 [1]. > I'm not fluent at C, but the relevant part of the patch seems > pretty small. No idea how easy to backport it would be, though. > > Daniel, what are your plans regarding this unblock request? > > [1] > http://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=gpa.git;a=commit;h=61e00549baf8992983b1fc9bff9f492429ec64c8 > > [...]
Hi, Daniel, would you consider backporting the patch intrigeri suggested? If there are couple of other "nice" (i.e. reviewable) changes you want to backport, I would be willing to consider those as well. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5100fc27.7070...@thykier.net
