On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 15:15 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 01/20/2013 12:40 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Thanks. It looks like that was as "1.0-1.1+wheezy1" however, which means > > its version is higher than unstable. > > Well, damn, I was too quick, should have used a ~ instead of a + sign. > > How about I make some cosmetic changes to the version in unstable (e.g. > lintian clean-up) and do another NMU into unstable to bump the version > to 1.0-1.2?
That would work, yeah; it's not the cleanest solution ever, but the tpu appears to have built on the majority of architectures already. The alternative is we drop the earlier tpu packages followed by a re-versioned upload. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1358719577.24414.10.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
