On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 22:35:33 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > It might be best to revert all the changes in unstable (since -1) that are not > suitable for wheezy, and try to get a version in unstable that fixes both RC > bugs in a non-intrusive way (based on -1). That way, the package could be > tested in unstable before it gets to wheezy. The changes that are in -2 could > go to experimental for now. > Agreed.
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
