Hi, I realized the previous 0.28-2.1 proposal had UNRELEASED as suite.
I corrected this and attached the patch based on ensymble 0.28-2 to obtain 0.28-2.1. I would really prefer 0.29-1, but if not, Is this 0.28-2.1 version acceptable for a new upload? 2012/10/10 Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petri...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > In order to increase chances a better ensymble is in wheezy, I also > created a NMU based on the 0.28 version: 0.28-2.1 which only fixes the > python-central deprecation issue. > > Patch is attached. Ditto for package. > > > 2012/10/7 Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petri...@gmail.com>: >> 2012/10/7 Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petri...@gmail.com>: >>> Hi Debian Release, >>> >>> A small summary of current situation: >>> - ensymble is in RFA since Jan 2011 (#611552) >>> - ensymble upstream released 0.29 in May 2010 >>> (http://code.google.com/p/ensymble/downloads/list) >>> - new upstream 0.29 also fixes #629125 >>> - debian currently has 0.28-2 in sid and wheezy >>> - 0.28-2 uses the deprecated py_central (#616799) >>> - Dominic has made most of the work for the preparation of 0.29-1 and >>> published it in a git repo >>> - I cloned his repo and provided a fix for #616799 targeting for 0.29-1 >>> - I am not a DD or DM, nor do I have the time to adopt ensymble (but I >>> would like to see 0.29 in wheezy) >>> >>> >>> Please also see comments below and advice on the preferred course of action. >> >>> Not sure if debian-release has an attachment size-based filter, so >>> I'll send the updated package to the BRs in a separate mail to make >>> sure the message arrives in debian-release. >> >> Attached the new files. The orig, of course, is the same as before. -- Regards, EddyP ============================================= The universe is not required to be in perfect harmony with human ambition. - Carl Sagan
0.28.-2.1.patch
Description: Binary data
