On Thu, September 27, 2012 20:52, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:53 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: >> On Wed, September 26, 2012 11:02, Philipp Kern wrote: >> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:17:53AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: >> >> OK, so we need to update ia32-libs again, now that all changes are >> in. > [...] >> > ok, please upload as soon as possible (i.e. today). >> >> Thanks - uploaded. > > Unfortunately, this leaves us with a bit of an issue, given the > imminence of a point release; namely: > > ia32-libs | 20120102 | stable | source, amd64, ia64 > ia32-libs | 20120102 | testing | source, amd64, ia64 > ia32-libs | 20120701 | unstable | source, amd64 > ia32-libs | 20120926 | proposed-updates | source, amd64, ia64 > > As far as I can see, the choices we have are: > > a) prop-up the packages from p-u to testing (meh) and unstable (bad) > during the point release > b) exclude ia32-libs from the point release (not ideal) > c) get a newer (well, higher versioned) ia32-libs package in to unstable > - on both amd64 _and_ ia64 - before Saturday morning. > > Longer term, stable updates probably want a different version scheme...
Right... this worked in the past but fails now there's been some action on ia32-libs in sid. I can upload a new version (20120102+squeeze1 I propose), do you need to reject the current upload first? Cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
