Hi,
since gtk+3.0 again appeared on my testing summary page (packages of
interest as far as unblock{,-udeb}'s are concerned), I'm wondering
whether it shouldn't just get its block-udeb removed?
I haven't heard yet of plans to port d-i to gtk3, and that wouldn't
happen during the wheezy release cycle anyway, so removing that
block-udeb would spare some questions/brain cycles on the -boot/-release
side when considering unblock{,-udeb}'s. Don't you think?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
