Hi Martin, (reordering some paragraphs while quoting/replying)
Martin Pitt <mp...@debian.org> (18/08/2012): > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Hello release team, > > yesterday, PostgreSQL announced new security/bug fix microreleases: > > http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1407/ > > I uploaded 9.1.5 into unstable with priority "medium": > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/postgresql-9.1/news/20120817T223635Z.html FSVO “micro” :( 1545 files changed, 35300 insertions(+), 73523 deletions(-) > There are no packaging changes except debian/changelog. Do you want an > unfiltered/filtered upstream diff, etc? Next time, feel free to provide a debdiff without *.html and *.po updates. Down to: 379 files changed, 5650 insertions(+), 43919 deletions(-) > The package successfully passes the upstream as well as the > postgresql-common integration tests and built fine on most > architectures except of mipsel where it is still needs-build. That kind of is reassuring, even if the diffstat above is still scary. Even if we're talking about security/bug fixes, I'm wondering whether we shouldn't let it spend more time in unstable before considering an unblock. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature