On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 13:02 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 09:45:14PM +0000, Luca Falavigna wrote: > > If you think your package should be targeted Wheezy, please let Release Team > > know and discuss with them about the best way to handle the transition. If > > that > > is not the case, your package will be processed after Wheezy release. If you > > want to give it broader testing, there is another option: we can reject it > > from > > the NEW queue, and let you upload it to experimental instead. > > Well, release team knows that this package was supposed to make it into Wheezy > to fix the incorrect major version number in the library. Release team, could > you please tell us what to do? Do you consider letting libcitadel3 and the > corresponding citadel/webcit packages into Wheezy? If so, we should get it out > of NEW. If not, do we release with the buggy version?
Does 8.14-1 contain any changes beyond the SONAME change and corresponding library package rename? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1345233967.31960.24.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
