any feedback would be welcome Cheers,
On Thu, 05 Jul 2012, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Hi Release Team, > 2 packages of mine, primarily due to demanding resources for build (c++ > with heavy use of templating) and testing (I do prefer to do build-time > testing and they use realistic data) always were somewhat > problematic to be built across architectures; thus they were removed > from wheezy (while in testing) whenever new FTBFS were detected. Both > are highly specialized to the field of neuroimaging. Both are old > versions (see below) but relatively popular as for a specialized > software. > ants > ---- > Slightly updated snapshot version than then one in squeeze > Fresh upstream version requires fresh ITK (in experimental) > popcon ~100 > FTBFS atm on mips, mipsel, s390 imho due to insufficient resources > and might be tricky to make them build reliably > openmeeg > -------- > The same upstream version as in squeeze -- minor additional patching (gcc > 4.7) + enabled build time unittests > Fresh upstream requires fresh libmat (in experimental) > popcon ~200 > FTBFS atm on mips only, and could be resolved simply through > disabling build time unittesting > I wondered, than even if I manage to overcome FTBFS on those -- would > they be allowed to come back to wheezy? > Thanks in advance -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120714013839.gb5...@onerussian.com
