Jonathan McCrohan <jmccro...@gmail.com> (11/07/2012): > On 10 July 2012 18:46, Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > > I suspect this may just swap you one bug report for another - libllvm3.0 is > > multi-arch: same, which means that if it's binNMUed then e.g. > > libllvm3.0:amd64 and libllvm3.0:i386 will no longer be co-installable. > > I assume a dummy sourceful upload would be the best course of action > here? I assume there shouldn't be any issues getting it unblocked from > testing migration either?
Yes; yes (assuming no actual changes are included; otherwise, changes will needed to get reviewed). Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
