Hi, On Wed May 30, 2012 at 22:29:32 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Hi, > > > > On Wed May 16, 2012 at 13:19:48 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears, > >> we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of release > >> architectures for the Wheezy release. > >> > >> Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of > >> http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html would be appreciated, > >> as would any other information you think is relevant to helping us > >> determine sparc's status for the release. > > > > with my DSA hat on: > > > > We no longer have an UltraSparc II porterbox, and we are considering > > decommissioning our single remaining UltraSparc II buildd machine. > > > > Maybe it would be a good idea to officially drop US II support from > > wheezy since we won't have hardware to test issues on. > > Might make sense, but on the other hand the USII machines were usually those > where issues did *not* show up. Especially USIII liked to be a problem child > as > the specs were never released by sun. It got better with USIV again... So some > state like 'not officially supported, but should just work' is probably the > best > for USII.
if that means, DSA does not need to operate those machines for the project any more, i am fine with that. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas <zo...@debian.org> | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster GPG key http://go.debian.net/B11B627B | GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120530203434.gh29...@ftbfs.de
