On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 22:53:49 -0400, Pascal Giard wrote: > >> Hello dear release team, >> >> With libsox2 in the archive, we can start the transition (late but >> hopefully not too late) so that the new SoX can make it into testing. >> The following source packages need to be rebuilt: >> ebook-speaker >> imagination >> >> IIUC, the transition has the following parameters: >> is_affected = .build-depends ~ /libsox-dev/; >> is_good = .depends ~ /libsox2/; >> is_bad = .depends ~ /libsox1b/; >> > Thanks, added as > http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libsox2.html > >> Please schedule binNMUs for the above mentioned packages on all >> architectures except ebook-speaker on hurd-i386 where the rebuild >> seems to be done already(!). >> > Scheduled.
Thanks! In order for me to do things properly next time, if I understand the procedure properly (explained at [1]) , I should first fill a bug report against release.debian.org. Once I get the approval from the release team, only then should I upload the new package to unstable and send the email to debian-release@lists.debian.org like I did. Is that correct? Thanks, -Pascal [1] wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions -- Homepage (http://organact.mine.nu) Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org) COMunité/LACIME: École de technologie supérieure (http://www.comunite.ca) Integrated Microsystems Laboratory: McGill (http://www.iml.ece.mcgill.ca) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAJNNDm=7hjfh4bwirf0sdjhpxja17z09bgp0jk2qq-gt4...@mail.gmail.com
