On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 19:35 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > Looks like group reply in my mailer means reply only to the mailing list > I have defined a filter for? Anyway, forwarding to debian-release too.
*checks headers* You wanted "reply all", predictably enough. Which means this is now annoyingly unthreaded. You also didn't copy -hurd on your forward... > On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 18:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > I'm not sure we've ever released with an architecture which was in > > > either broken or fucked, but hopefully someone will correct me if I'm > > > mistaken on that. > > > > Anyone? :-) > > > > Opinions as to whether it makes sense to release an architecture in > > either of those states would also be welcome. > > Is there a definition of what broken and fucked means, so this could be > related to. Well, the question was primarily aimed at members of the Release Team, who know what the terms mean. In short, an architecture is "broken" if a source package may migrate even though doing so causes new uninstallability on that architecture. A fucked architecture is one on which source packages may migrate even if the packages have not yet been built on the architecture. > Also, is "tech preview" defined somewhere. Were there any > descriptions made/discussions when kFreeBSD was introduced for Squeeze? Phil already addressed this. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1337883952.25124.6.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
