On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 17:44:24 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> tag 655912 + pending
> thanks
>
> On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 11:57 +0100, Nick Leverton wrote:
> > Sorry for delay, I had a bug on the transition from one of my
> > dependencies, and have been away+offline much of the last two weeks.
> > Both problems should be sorted this weekend though - will get onto it
> > as soon as I'm back home!
>
> The new version of libupnp made it out of NEW in the past few days.
> It's now built everywhere except kfreebsd-i386 so I'm looking at
> binNMUing the reverse-dependencies.
>
So, hrm. Why do libupnp{3,6} ship multiple libraries with
non-synchronized SONAMEs in a single binary package? That means they
have to conflict, which is very much suboptimal.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120501231309.gz31...@radis.cristau.org
