reassign 671066 release.debian.org thanks Santiago Vila <sanv...@unex.es> writes: > I see that diffutils_1:3.2-6, which was uploaded with urgency=low, > will only need 5 days to enter testing, probably because I made > 1:3.2-4 to be urgency=medium. I don't know when you changed the > algorithm but I think it is a bad change. > > In this case, the reason to modify the urgency was that 1:3.2-4 just > tried to disable a test which failed, while 1:3.2-6 has real code > changes which IMHO, deserve the usual 10 days in unstable. > > The traditional meaning of "urgency" has always been "the time > required for *this* upload to supersede the version currently in > testing" and that's why I used urgency=low in 1:3.2-6. > > However, if urgencies accumulate, how are we supposed to really mean > "10 days" after an upload not of low priority? It's impossible! > > So please reconsider the way urgencies are handled. The traditional > way worked well enough and the current behaviour is a lot confusing.
Reassigned to release.d.o as they handle migration to testing. Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87lilbq137....@deep-thought.43-1.org
