On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 15:27 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 03/12/2012 02:38 PM, Alessandro Grassi wrote: > > The NFS sources don't get mounted directly by init (in which case that line > > would have worked), instead they are mounted by the post-up hook in > > ifupdown (see /etc/network/if-up.d/mountnfs), as i mentioned in my original > > mail. [...] > right. the difference seems to be: > > --- 2.88dsf-13.1/etc/network/if-up.d/mountnfs 2012-03-12 > +++ 2.88dsf-22/etc/network/if-up.d/mountnfs 2011-12-28 > @@ -98,9 +100,10 @@ > # and/or rpc.idmapd, and loads the right kernel modules if > # applicable) if we use Kerberos and/or NFSv4 mounts. > # > - if [ "$start_nfs" = yes ] && [ -x /etc/init.d/portmap ] && [ -x > /etc/init.d/nfs-common ] > + if [ "$start_nfs" = yes ] && [ -x /etc/init.d/nfs-common ] > then > - /etc/init.d/portmap start > + [ -x /etc/init.d/portmap ] && /etc/init.d/portmap start > + [ -x /etc/init.d/rpcbind ] && /etc/init.d/rpcbind start > /etc/init.d/nfs-common start > fi [...] > sysvinit maintainers, release team -- what do y'all think of this > proposal? I'd be happy to prepare a package with this targeted fix for > squeeze-proposed-updates if you think that would be acceptable.
It looks okay to me, although I'd like to see a final debdiff before acking an upload; thanks. Any comment from the sysvinit side? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1332618437.20074.38.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
