Hi, > I'm bcc'ing this email to maintainers of the list of packages, below. > Each of you, I'd appreciate it if you could check with the upstream > authors whether a fix is already available. Please send an update > to the appropriate bug with the upstream response or mark the bug > forwarded to the upstream issue. I'm hoping that some of these > can be fixed very quickly and we'll shortly know the true impact > of a boost defaults change. > libreoffice 1:3.4.4-2 Failed [GCC_ERROR] #652784: libreoffice: FTBFS: > acceleratorcache.cxx:64:29: error: no match for 'operator=' in > '((framework::AcceleratorCache*)this)->framework::AcceleratorCache::m_lCommand2Keys > = > rCopy.framework::AcceleratorCache::m_lCommand2Keys'
This is already forwarded etc. and I already said various times that it will be in the next upload (currently planned to be 3.4.5-1, see http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/3.4#3.4.5_release). But what worries me more is that you AGAIN ignored http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652681. Ignoring #652681 doesn't make the build failure on the version which is supposed to be in wheezy go away... Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111228114734.111...@gmx.net
