[If you're going to set reply-to in order to not get CCed on replies, please consider not CCing others on your own follow-ups]
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 23:01 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 12/15/2011 10:50 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > For the record, I did not forget. I was under the impression that what > > you'd previously requested, and what we had agreed, was that you wished > > to be copied on the mails announcing the dates of the point releases, > > no; i said it numerous times already, the last time was: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2011/09/msg00036.html (and to which you appear to have ignored the response, at least publicly) That mail says you'd like to know "the rough estimated date" for planning purposes, which is simple enough in any case - two months after the previous one. I know we don't always stick rigidly to that, but it should be a good enough guide for deciding when to commit fixes, work on particular issues, etc.. The purpose of the initial co-ordination mails is precisely to narrow that "rough estimated date" to an exact date, for those who need to be involved in the process on the day itself, as it's happening. It's not copied to -boot, for instance, or -kernel, but both teams still know roughly when uploads will need to be ready for. (Actually, in both of those cases fixes generally get worked on and uploaded throughout the cycle rather than just towards the end, which is arguably a better workflow for all involved.) > nothing changed before that, nothing changed since that, and i have > nothing more to add to that. Then I suspect you haven't read the above. Hopefully it does some good for someone, in any case. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1323987593.20136.30.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
